[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: LDP License (full text)

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LDP License (full text)
From: "Richard Ames" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 09:39:59 +1000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: <[email protected]>
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 1 Oct 1999 23:40:10 -0000
Resent-from: [email protected]
Resent-message-id: <zSku7.A.52D.ZZU93@murphy>
Resent-sender: [email protected]


<cut>
> LINUX DOCUMENTATION PROJECT LICENSE (LDPL)
> v2.0, 12 January 1998
>
<cut>

This looks generally sensible.  My view is - The author always owns the
copyright. The (free) license he gives allows others to reproduce the work
or extend it...

A related and interesting (recent) court result is at
http://www.nwu.org/tvt/9909vic.htm

Regards,

Richard.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Follow-Ups:
- A restrictive(?) LDP License
  - From: Sandy Harris <[email protected]>

References:
- LDP License (full text)
  - From: [email protected] (David Lawyer)

Prev by Date: Meaningful subject lines - please.
Next by Date: Simple idea
Previous by thread: Re: LDP License (full text)
Next by thread: A restrictive(?) LDP License
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread