[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: experimental release of linuxdoc-tools (based on sgml-tools 1.0.9)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: experimental release of linuxdoc-tools (based on sgml-tools 1.0.9)
From: [email protected] (Cees de Groot)
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 21:13:32 +0200
Cc: "Greg Ferguson" <[email protected]>, [email protected], Taketoshi Sano <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: Your message of "17 May 2000 12:32:36 EDT." <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Resent-date: Wed, 17 May 2000 15:16:53 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-from: [email protected]
Resent-message-id: <arpSaD.A.GKG.I_uI5@murphy>
Resent-sender: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


[email protected] said:
> BTW, I believe SGMLtools v2 is dead in favor of SGMLtools lite. 

Yup. The difference being that the latter doesn't bundle Jade, JadeTeX, the 
DocBook DTD and DSSSL stuff, ... anymore. Nothing else.
-- 
Cees de Groot               http://www.cdegroot.com     <[email protected]>
                            http://sgmltools-lite.sourceforge.net/
GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD  1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B
Forge your CipherSaber and list it: http://www.xs4all.nl/~cg/ciphersaber/

PGP signature

References:
- Re: experimental release of linuxdoc-tools (based on sgml-tools 1.0.9)
  - From: Adam Di Carlo <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: experimental release of linuxdoc-tools (based on sgml-tools 1 .0.9)
Next by Date: Re: SGML tools aren't so great
Previous by thread: Re: experimental release of linuxdoc-tools (based on sgml-tools 1.0.9)
Next by thread: Re: experimental release of linuxdoc-tools (based on sgml-tools 1.0.9)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread